30 January 2026
Sports are filled with moments that make us stop and think, “What if?” But few questions trigger a fan's imagination more than blockbuster trades that were this close to happening — and then never did. You know the ones… those deals whispered about in locker rooms and front offices, only to be shut down at the last second. The sliding doors moments of sports history.
And let’s be real — as fans, we live for that drama. We think about how different everything would be if that one trade had gone through. Championships could swing, dynasties could crumble, and careers? Totally rewritten.
So grab a snack, kick back, and let’s dive into some of the juiciest, most mind-blowing what-if trades that almost happened in sports history — but didn’t.
But the Lakers weren't willing to play ball without Deng being included. And just like that, the talks died.
Hard to say for sure. But one thing’s certain — the landscape of the late 2000s NBA would have looked very different.
But MLB’s Players Association wasn’t having it. They shot the deal down, saying it would set a bad precedent. The Red Sox couldn’t make the math work without that concession.
And what about the Yankees-Red Sox rivalry? Would A-Rod have helped Boston end the Curse of the Bambino sooner than 2004? Or would tensions have exploded if he ended up feuding with teammates like he later did in New York?
The butterfly effect here is massive.
Manning met with the team and even went through some workouts. But in the end? He didn’t feel comfortable with the offense. He chose Denver.
Would Manning have led the Niners to multiple titles? Probably. Would Colin Kaepernick ever have seen the field? Probably not. That’s one quarterback decision that might’ve changed the course of several careers.
It’s said that Gretzky himself preferred Detroit, but the off-ice factors tipped the deal toward Los Angeles.
Plus, the NHL's growth in the U.S. — especially in sunny California? Probably slower without Gretzky’s star power lighting up LA.
But then? NBA Commissioner David Stern, acting as owner of the league-controlled Hornets, vetoed the trade for “basketball reasons.” That was it. No Paul to LA.
Chris Paul and Kobe Bryant running pick-and-rolls? That would’ve been electric. It could have extended Kobe’s prime, changed CP3’s legacy, and swung the entire balance of power in the West.
Instead, the Lakers struggled, Paul went to the Clippers, and we all got robbed of a dream pairing.
According to some front-office insiders, a deal was agreed on, but Nats ownership pulled the plug at the last minute. They didn’t want to give up their franchise face for a couple of prospects.
Would he have helped them win another World Series? Would he still have ended up in Philly? And how would fans have remembered his D.C. legacy if he’d been traded, even briefly?
It’s one of those ghost trades that brings more questions than answers.
But they didn’t move up. The Kansas City Chiefs did, jumping ahead of them to grab Mahomes at No. 10. The Saints took cornerback Marshon Lattimore instead — a solid pick, but still…
That dome would’ve turned into a Madden cheat code. Sean Payton calling plays for Mahomes? Forget about it — defenses would’ve just thrown up their hands in surrender.
Instead, Mahomes became a Chief and three trips to the Super Bowl later, well… the rest is history.
They remind us that in sports, the margins are razor-thin. A blocked call, a vetoed trade, a draft pick not made — they all have the power to change everything.
And maybe that’s why we love it so much. Because in every “what if?” there’s a story as compelling as the truth.
So the next time your favorite team pulls out of a deal or misses on a player by one draft spot, just remember: history's biggest legends were often shaped by the trades that didn’t happen — not just the ones that did.
all images in this post were generated using AI tools
Category:
Player TradesAuthor:
Easton Simmons
rate this article
1 comments
Taylor McDermott
These 'what-if' trades are like daydreams—entertaining, but in reality, just wishful thinking!
January 31, 2026 at 11:50 AM